Osama bin Laden, death, redemptive violence, Christian, love, god is love
As it became apparent that the President had called an unexpected address to the nation to announce the death of Osama bin Laden, social networks erupted with jubilation. Shortly after that, ground zero and grounds in front of the White House, with their 9/11 connections, became gathering places for the raucous crowds.

For a night, so many of this mostly divided nation were united... over a death. Not just united, joyfully so. 

“He's won,” I thought. One of bin Laden's primary goals was to cause terror in the US and he has. Not buildings collapsing terror. Not dirty bombs exploding terror. What happened was more diabolical than that. We lost our humanity...or we lived vengefully into it, whichever way you care to see it. We gave into our primal instinct. We answered blood-lust with blood-lust, vengeance with vengeance. We solved the problem of murder with murder.  As Dr. King once noted, “The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth. Through violence you murder the hater, but you do not murder hate. In fact, violence merely increases hate. Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate. Only love can do that.”

I know that is not a popular point of view and I fully recognize that this post will probably evoke more negative responses than positive, but in looking at the teaching of Jesus, I do find it to be a solid biblical point of view. I do not ask you to see it the way that I do. I just need to give voice to it.

I was even more bereft in watching so many of my dear Christian friends quote the Bible in order to justify their understandable need to rejoice that this man, who seems to be the devil personified for most people, was brought to his end – violently. I even sort of understand why they sought out Bible verses: because there was a part of them, the part that is a reflection of God, the part placed in each human as God metaphorically breathed the very breath of God into each of us, that knew this was wrong in the eyes of God. Their humanity needed to overcome the piece of divinity that was trying to speak out.

That piece of our humanity that so easily gives into hate, vengeance, anger, retribution, and blood-lust is the most powerful weapon that a man like bin Laden has. It divides not only nations but the world. It divides not only communities but it also divides individuals against their better selves.

People who would never intentionally cherry pick Bible verses were using text out of context to justify their actions rather than using the verse to guide their actions. Saying things like, “live by the sword, die by the sword,” to give vengeance a biblical sounding edge, never realizing that those kind of swords cut both ways. It divides nations. It divides our very spirits. That is a powerful weapon.

Worse yet, (at least from a Christian perspective), seeing the death of anyone as redemptive reduces love to a trite keepsake, a bauble, a plaything of convenience. Even on the cross it was not the suffering that was redemptive, it was the love of the one who laid down his life for his friends and the love of God that was redemptive. When we try to make violence redemptive (and we can only try, because it never will be), we make violence the end all be all. We elevate it above love... and when we do that, we elevate it above God who is love. We make it a religion unto itself. 

It was good to see cooler heads begin to prevail in Christian communities the day after, but this isn't the first time we have lived into that human instinct to try to make violence redemptive. I am left to wonder, will we resist the urge the next time? Because there will be a next time.

I agree with Rob Bell, love wins. Hate begets hate. Fear begets fear. Violence begets violence. Love begets love. 

"I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear." -MLK



(UPDATE: As expected, I've received many more negative responses than normal. The largest majority of them actually proved part of my point by being mostly hateful and verbally violent. The ones that were primarily name calling have been deleted. Negative responses that do not leave their real name and email will also be deleted. For now, I'll leave the comment section open. If necessary, I will switch to approving comments before they are posted. I welcome negative feedback. I do, however, insist it avoid name calling and that it is a response and not an attack.)

 


Comments

B.
05/02/2011 18:10

Thank you for being the voice of reason. God's blessings to everyone who mourns.

Reply
05/02/2011 18:39

I end up needing to mention this from time to time. If you would like to disagree and with my point of view I welcome it, but if you are going to do so I do expect you to leave your actual name and email. I put my name with my point of view and require those who wish to express a counter point of view to show the same willingness. (One comment pertaining to this post has already been deleted because of this). Also, let's try to avoid name calling and labeling as a form of argument. Thanks.

Reply
05/02/2011 18:44

Thank you for this. It takes a prophet to stand against the flow of thoughtless jubilation to attempt to recall people to the image of God we were created to reflect rather than the image of destruction we are always tempted towards.

Was it necessary to destroy this life? I guess it seemed efficient (rather than trial and imprisonment), but History gives us no examples of a violent act doing anything but spawning more violence. Only love and relationship can transform animosity into enduring peace.

I mourn Bin Laden's success in stirring the worst expression of American might. I mourn the loss to the world of all the good that a person of his resources, intelligence, creativity and passion could have done with his life -- had not those abilities been subverted into destructive uses.

"A good day for America"? I'm not so sure about that.

Reply
Barry Singh
05/02/2011 18:45

Oh so pompous. Christians Destroyed!

Are all Christians now destroyed, Mark? Was this killing some sort of super-apocalyptic end run around prophecies of end times?

Or are just *some* Christians destroyed?

Which ones?

I presume that if any have been preserved from the destruction wrought by Osama's "Death Weapon" (whatever that means) then you are among the survivors, the elect--at least in your own mind.

And you don't even ask me to believe this. But you need to "give voice" to it all the same. That said, reading your editorial aloud in your back yard wasn't voice enough. Perhaps because more than the just the chipmunks and wrens and daffodils need to be presented with your presumptuous display of moral superiority.

I won't inquire as to who it was that annointed you to determine which Christians are "destroyed". I'll just accept for the moment your implicit claim to have such Divine authority.

Your contention that Bin Laden "won" by being shot twice in the face suggests that those responsible for the shooting have lost. What is your game theory here? Was this a zero-sum situation or something else? You have chosen to put this in game theoretic terms in your blog post, but you have done so in a quite slippery way.

What if Bin Laden not been shot? What if indeed had he masterminded the killing of thousands *more* innocents of every creed? This, then, would have been a *loss* for him as compared to recent events?

Would it have been a win for us, somehow, had we "succeeded" in letting him go his way to murder again and agitate for murder of innocents?

I'm not going to cherry pick scripture One needn't in order to point out that no document has ever done more to advance the myth of redemptive violence than the Bible.

How many thousands of enemies fell under the sword, or to pestilence or other violent horrors, in so many stories in that book, all to God's pleasure? How many died horribly in The Flood? Answer. Almost everybody. Or that other flood in the Red Sea, or in the plagues upon the Pharoah's people?

Redemptive violence is the central theme of the New Testament, and of many other stories in the Bible. And you kknow it as well as anyone.

Mark, Bin Laden was a (self-avowed) lethal threat to you, myself, our families, our communities, our country, and to people around the globe, including Muslims--many of whom he has been responsible for killing.

It is not a rejection of love to rejoice at the destruction of such a threat. It a blindness of a very Pollyannish sort to suggest that it is.

The willingness of others to confront violence with the threat of counter-violence or indeed with counter-violence, is the *sine qua non* of your liberty to express your smug self righteousness.

You assume, oh-so-judgementaly, that the man who shot Bin Laden in the face--as well as all who cheered the result--were motivated by hate. This kind of blind, sweeping indictment certainly has lots of Old Testament precedent, but where does it belong in a theology of Love?

While hates may have been in play, things certainly may have been otherwise. It may have been love for those threatened by the murderous fanatic, and a sense of duty to that love and those loved ones.

I don't know and neither do you. But only one of of us is "giving voice to" talk about hate driving out hate in response to that action.

You attribute blood-lust to Bin Laden, discounting all other possible sets of motivations out of hand. And you attribute blood-lust to those who killed Obama and those who have been pleased at that result.

You somehow know the hearts of millions the world around, and occupy some blesssed pinnacle whereat moral condemnation of strangers whose motivations are also strange to you is both natural and good, and much to be "voiced".

You call yourself progressive. A man is known by his acts.

Your self-righteous, judgemental condemnation (what else could "destroyed" mean) of your fellow man gives nothing away to that of the most retrogressive, fire and brimstone faux-Christian who ever raged under a revival tent or studio lights.

One threat has been destroyed.

Other similar threats remain.

And other sorts of threats altogether.

Reply
Barry Singh
05/02/2011 18:52

I hope it is obvious that I meant Osama rather than Obama in the 7th paragraph from the bottom of my post.

I would be grateful if you would make the correction as I don't seem to have the capability.

Reply
Stacy Miller
05/02/2011 18:52

You have given voice to my thoughts. I thank you!

Reply
Matthew Frank
05/02/2011 18:56

I totally understand this view. However, we need to place it in a different context. This man will no longer be able to plan, finance, and aid the murder of innocent people. His death was a lesser evil than his continued existence. Yes, people will use him as a reason to kill innocents--but those same people would use other reasons if he hadn't been killed. So while ending of life is wrong, God does realize that there are times when it is the lesser of two evils. God did sanction capital punishment (and no, Jesus's protection of the prostitute did *not* repeal that!) and did sanction wars when the end result was making the world a better place by destroying some people- and God-defiling evil.

Bin Laden willingly chose to give up his humanity and his redemption, resisting all attempts at reconciliation and continued to perpetuate violence. Such a person, like a Hitler, Stalin, Tojo, Mao, etc., is, sadly, an evil that is better off destroyed. And he will face the Holy One in judgment and be called to task for his misdeeds. *That* is what we are celebrating!

Reply
Matthew Frank
05/02/2011 18:59

I guess my point could be simpler--given the inevitable choice between murdering an innocent, or preventing the murder by killing the murderer, which one would God choose? And honestly, yes, it is that simple in this case.

Reply
sue hickey
05/02/2011 19:05

I don't support the death penalty under any circumstance. I do understand that so many people are thankful that the gentleman "met his Maker." But the sight of people partying hard in front of the White House disturbs me. It's akin to dancing on one's grave. We should not stoop to the levels demonstrated by others. It is too bad that Mr. bin Laden took such a hateful path. He was obviously very intelligent, hard working and dedicated - too much so - to a faith that he unfortunately perverted. I look at his face - lose the beard and he would have been a very handsome man, with those eyes...

Reply
Karen Cook
05/02/2011 20:03

Thank you for this well worded article. You make me proud to be a Presbyterian. I am reminded of the sermon that my minister preached the Sunday after 9/11. Many in the congregation were not pleased with his call to not repay violence with violence. Sometimes we need a reminder of what God's true message is.

Reply
05/02/2011 20:05

Well said.

Reply
05/02/2011 21:11

Thank you, thank you, thank you.

I too am disturbed by all this. In response we have created a Facebook group to pray for the soul of Osama.

We recognise that only love is stronger than death, only compassion greater than hate. We acknowledge that all authentic religious and spiritual traditions teach these virtues and verities. We pray for the soul of Osama so he, like all may be redeemed in the infinite love of the One. We pray for him as a symbol and focal point of prayers for all who are twisted with hate and violence. We pray for him as an antidote to the glorification of hatred his death has unleashed.

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_219622861381775

thanks :)

Reply
Cyn
05/02/2011 21:20

Thank you for voicing my views on violence so eloquently. Not many in my life understand where I come from on that subject. So nice to know I am not some living out of reality.

Reply
James Walley
05/02/2011 21:42

While I agree with much of what you wrote, can you seriously think that Osama bin Ladin was the one who caused us to "los(e) our humanity...or live vengefully into it?" It seems that happened a long time ago. If it didn't happen when Americans celebrated the incineration of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians at Hiroshima and Nagasaki (a popular joke of the time was that the residents of those cities were suffering from "atomic-ache"...har, har, har), then it happened even earlier, when "the only good Indian is a dead Indian" became the byword of the manifest destiny era, or with the reconciling of America as a "sweet land of liberty" with the importation and exploitation of thousands upon thousands of African slaves.

We need to face the fact that we didn't fall from some state of primordial innocence and goodness on 9/11. Rather, the "loss of humanity" was a trait which has been going on as long as flawed humankind existed, and which must be combated every step of the way. The jubilation over the killing of bin Ladin is merely another outbreak, and maybe not even one of the most virulent ones, of a long-term illness stretching out beyond our farthest memory.

Reply
ron coleman
05/02/2011 22:04

It would be a lie to say that I'm not glad this threat has been erased, but I don't rejoice in the death of this soul.

The choices we make are often dictated by the circumstances that are thrust upon us. Justice and grace are not enemies -- they can co-exist.

I wonder what the early Christians though of Saul of Tarsus and if they would have rejoiced in his death. Loving a friend is easy, loving someone like ourselves can be done, but loving the hateful enemy can come only from God.

Reply
Walter Pavlik II
05/02/2011 22:28

I have mixed emotions regarding the death of Bin Ladin.
Clearly, the ANGER and RAGE I felt on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001 cried out for the death of this man who had incited others to kill for what he claimed were the glory of Allah, but were simply his ego desired to be known as a power who could bring the United States to their knees as a world power.
On the other hand, as time went by, and our country's "Decider in Chief" attacked a country that had nothing to do with those attacks, but they did have a bunch of oil, and were lead by a man who attempted to kill his "Daddy", and a half-serious attempt to find Bin Ladin out in the hills of Afghanastan. (where we probably knew he wasn't, but there were poppy fields there, so it couldn't be bad to attack those folks, could it?) We got dragged into an enormous amount of debt to pay for these wars which seem to have no end. Our military has killed hundreds of thousands of people. We have lost thousands of our military during this exercise. Our economy is in a shambles after years of this. Oil prices are skyrocketing because an ex-oil exec said back in January that "Gas would probably be $5 per gallon by this Summer" and that set off the speculators...
(Where am I going with this? There's a point, honest, I just have to frame it...)
In all of this completely horrible news we hear every day, (Let's not even start on natural disasters that have caused death and destruction in our state and across the Southeast...), we hear that FINALLY, we've "got Bin Ladin".
There was an instant hearing the news this morning, (we went to bed early last night ) that was relief, or perhaps "about time", but never really joy. Make no mistake, I believed this world would be a better place without him. Now, I must hope that will be the case.

Granted, like a hydra of Greek mythology, Al Queida will grow another, if not more heads. It would be nice if that weren't the case, but it simply is.
So, Yeah, part of me says, "Good Riddance", but I also remember the old saying "The King is dead, Long live the King!"

So, this liberal who is used to getting blasted by my much more conservative friends for being some sort of bleeding heart socialist believes that sometimes, killing is necessary for the greater good. I don't celebrate it, but I'm not gonna lose sleep over this guy either. It would be great if we didn't need armies, and could all live on this Earth in harmony, but that's not for this life, and I'm OK with that for now.

Reply
05/02/2011 23:42

They tried to take ben laden alive..if you see any pics of him..he carried an ak47..there was a firefight.This will never end..there is always someone to take the leaders place.Ben Laden even hated his own people and wanted death to all christians.I don't even know if he knew what love meant

Reply
Dwayne
05/02/2011 23:42

Mark,
I love your blog and this post in particular. Unfortunately, I believe the MLK quote may not be entirely correct:

http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/05/out-of-osamas-death-a-fake-quotation-is-born/238220/

Reply
Marti
05/03/2011 00:15

forgive me, I'm just a noob...wouldn't turning the other cheek in this situation be offering up the whole world as a sacrifice? Are we supposed to just watch it all go up in flames, while praying our hearts out? I think we have more options than that...

Reply
gracey
05/03/2011 01:31

Mark,
Once again you express the words in my heart. I thank God there are some who can see this for what it is.

Reply
05/03/2011 07:27

Thanks Dwayne. I think you'll find that, while it is similar, the quote I use is the actual quote and not the one floating around FB and Twitter.

Reply
gyasi
05/03/2011 07:37

first—i am so tired of people using dr. king's words of of context to defend their position. i would give a quick lesson on what was happening during the civil rights era, but this is not the place.

i don't celebrate bin laden's death. but, he chose not merely sin, but evil. and, as we say, the wages of sin are death.

Reply
Ed Erdmann
05/03/2011 08:15

Bin Laden's message was one of separation and divisiveness. To celebrate his death is to honor his message. Thank you, Mark, for being a voice for peace. Bless all who celebrate his detah that they may find peace in peace.

Reply
Rey Hinckley
05/03/2011 08:21

Thank you for the article. The Vatican also has received much negative commmentaries because it announced that being joyful about murder does not "square" with the teachings of the man called Christ.
I don't agree with the Vatican 100% of the time. But being raised Roman Catholic I view the teaching of Jesus as being more important than who some say that he was.
I don't even know if he was/is THE SON OF GOD, or just a prophet who was thrust into the role in order to make Roman Catholicism appear to be the only true faith.
What most Christians don't acknowledge is there is no real evidence to prove that Jesus was God but still kill in his name even though that action is diametrically opposed to his teaching. The only way that Christians can justify killing in is name is to believe that they were saved from sin even before they sinned.
I try to follow the teachings of Jesus not because I believe that he is the son of God, but because I believe that his death proved that he was serious about nonviolence.

Reply
05/03/2011 08:27

Greetings in Christ, Mark,

I appreciated your comments and find kinship with many of them.

I would agree, to a point, with Barry Singh (above): you did use a touch of hyperbole that may have been over-the-top. Not all Christians have succumbed to the celebratory mindset. Having said that, I would add that far too many of us have not only gotten caught up in this behavior, we have muddled “God” and “Country” as being close to on in the same. Sad, indeed.

I thought you might like to read the letter to the editor of my local newspaper that I wrote yesterday. It was published today. The paper requires comments to be 300 words or less, so I had to keep it short... I quote:

Be Thankful, Not Celebratory

I, perhaps many of you as well, found the news that Osama Bin Laden had been killed to be very surprising…we finally got him after all these years.
During the initial news reports Sunday night, there was footage of hundreds of people in front of the White House, exuberantly celebrating Bin Laden’s death. That scene brought to mind the news reports and videos seen ten years prior of radical Muslims celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Centers immediately following those hateful acts. I was reminded how that decade-old coverage made my stomach turn in knots — that any group of people could find reason to celebrate the murderous death of thousands. This current celebratory atmosphere in our Nation’s capital brought with it a similar sense of disgust. There appeared to be little difference regarding the level of hate, manifest by the radical Muslims at that earlier time under the guise of celebration, and what was now occurring in front of our presidential home.
The fact that Osama Bin Laden can no longer lead his followers to hate and kill under the banner of Islam is certainly reason to be thankful. Thankfulness is a proper response, but not celebration. For when we respond in that manner, we act no differently than those we loathe. The video footage of some Americans joyfully lauding the death of Osama will serve no greater purpose than to incite others to commit further acts of violence against innocent people. Hate fosters hate.
Having lived in Kabul, Afghanistan, as a contractor for a year taught me that building relationships with a people we don’t know or understand can and will serve to temper the distrust, hate and violence. Celebrating the death of a mad man will not. As a Christian I find myself praying: Come, Lord Jesus, come.
Michael K Mills
FAA Operations Supervisor, Retired

Reply
Jon C
05/03/2011 09:16

I agree with you completely Mark. Tho I left the Christian community because for two thousand years it been replete with violence and imperialism,I must say that I admire your message and am delighted to see that you are bringing fourth the intentions of the teachings of the Christ. Thank you for your courage.

Reply
Teri Nilson Baird
05/03/2011 09:45

Thank you, Mark. I am so grateful to be standing in such good company against the wave of nationalism and vengeance that has overtaken the country. May Peace be with you.

Reply
Christine McQueen
05/03/2011 09:57

Thank you for saying the things that have been bouncing around my mind for the last two days, since hearing the news on Sunday. In one way, I'm glad the man will no longer be planning the assaults against this country; in another way I know his death will arouse his followers to even further violence. And the scenes of jubilation all over the country via TV will simply make sure those followers remember it was our President who ordered that death.

Reply
Jim O'Gara
05/03/2011 11:01

I agree with this post, as well as a number of the comments. (Though, Barry Singh, I totally do not get the point you are trying to make. I think it's going to take me 3 read throughs just to get it.)

I like what Michael Mills wrote about being thankful, but not celebratory. I too am glad that Bin Laden is no longer here to plot more killings. But I would have rather him taken alive and brought to the Hague and tried in front of the world.

I also ponder on what Mark wrote about that Bin Laden won, in that he has gotten the U.S. to respond to violence with violence, and divisiveness with more divisiveness. I would further put forth that Bin Laden won in other ways as well. (And I know that it will not make me popular either.) Bin Laden stated in more than one video that his goal was to BANKRUPT the United States, and to that end he succeeded. Let's compare our costs.

His attack on us:

$200,000 at the most in cost, 19 "soldiers" dead. Killed apx. 3,000 people. Brought world economy to a halt.

Our attacks on Al-Quida:

2 UNFUNDED wars to the cost of $1 Trillion dollars and rising!!! (Because its leaders didn't have the temerity to raise taxes in a time of war! FACT: George W. Bush is the ONLY leader in the entire written history of the course of human civilization to not only NOT raise taxes in a time of war, but to have tax cuts!) Iraq U.S. Soldier death toll (as of May 1, 2011), 4452, Afghanistan U.S. Soldier death toll 1566 2011). (Both numbers there do not include international troops). Number of wounded U.S. soldiers requiring some form of medical assistance FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES (which will further cost the U.S. money), 30,000+ and rising. Time for the U.S. to make budgetary, monetary and tax policy changes before it defaults on its debt: less than 3 months.

Even with Bin Laden's death, his plan still have brought the U.S. to its knees. Along with other factors (economic and trade policy), it is one reason China will overtake the U.S. economy in 2016. We will no longer be the world's "superpower." Just by simple cost comparison, Bin Laden won, even in death, and I didn't even through in the costs of further occupying two countries with "enduring" military bases, nor the human cost of civilian lives lost.


Another point I think people miss when reading this post, and comments I make on my facebook page is that when the argument is presented that war isn't the best response to terrorism (I'm a citizen of Ireland and we have centuries of history dealing with English terrorism as well as our own fringe groups. POLICE ACTION is ALWAYS the most effective response to terrorism.), no where are we presenting that doing nothing in the face of evil is the choice we advocate. NO, we do advocate that justice must be made. Rather we advocate what Jesus commanded:

"You have heard that it was said, 'An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.' But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you."
—Matthew 5:38-42, NIV

27 ¶ But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,

"Bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you. And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not to take thy coat also. Give to every man that asketh of thee; and of him that taketh away thy goods ask them not again. And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise."
—Luke 6:27-31. KJV

I wonder how much traction Al-Queda would have had/have if the U.S. made sure that every Afghan child, or elsewhere in the Middle East, had adequate food, water, clothing and shelter. They'd have no support from anyone!

Reply
05/03/2011 11:30

Jim, as always, exceptionally well said. I particularly appreciate the point you make about the financial battle. Thank you for adding so much to the discussion.

Thank you to everyone participating. Some very insightful perspectives have been shared in your comments. This is an important topic and I appreciate how you have thoughtfully responded.

Reply
Maria Winde
05/03/2011 12:06

I agree with GYASI THE WAGES OF SIN ARE DEATH. He choose his own destiny. I do agree that peple should not have been gathering and celebrating outside the whitehouse, that was SICKENING, Don't get me wrong.
I was glad he was gone, butt not have a party raise the roof happy. I believe that for some of the 911 families this will help them a great deal. For that
I am Happy Because maybe just maybe they can finally get some closure in there hearts and minds. this is about more than just church and state. It is about the PEOPLE. I would also like to note that the president has known where Osama Bin Laden was since last August Kinda convienant that he decided to get him now. Just in time to make himself look pretty and shiny for relection

Reply
05/03/2011 12:17

I am glad the MLK quote has been corrected. But, with all due respect, yesterday the quote on this blog read as follows:

"As Dr. King once noted, “I will mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy. Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that.” "

Please don't imply that it was correct in the original post.

I love this blog. I'm not one of your detractors. I'm on of your biggest fans.

Reply
Sarah Frase
05/03/2011 12:35

I agree in part with your thoughts. I did not necessarily "rejoice" over bin Laden's death; however, I do not totally take your view either. God is not a "love-conquerors-all" God. He does destroy His enemies. One example: He sent David to destroy Goliath...and a nation rejoiced. And I don't categorize bin Laden's death as murder, but execution. The victims of 9-11 were murdered.

Reply
05/03/2011 13:11

Dwayne, my apologizes. You comment was posted after the quote had been changed (for the 3rd time actually). I assumed you were referring to the current content. I do apologize.

For the record for about 30 minutes the only part of the quote that was used was the last part which is present in both the correct and incorrect quotes. It said, "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate. Only love can do that.”

In editing a couple of typos I decided to use the expanded quote, which as I posted it was become very hot on FB. Both mine and the one on FB were incorrect. As I read the ones being reposted to FB, something felt... well, off about the whole quote. As I researched, I couldn't find the quote from a reliable source.

I did find the correct quote, however, and changed to that. A number of people FB messaged me to say that the current quote was incorrect. I assumed that you were making the same point. My mistake. (On a related note, I found the original quote on a The West Wing site. Turns out they had used the quote in the show).

Reply
Linda Chiodini
05/03/2011 13:59

God supported His Army when he helped the walls of Jerico to come down, etc. We must STAND for what is RIGHT. We must be strong and willing to fight for it. Our forefathers did and if we want to keep this a strong nation under God, we MUST do the same. I am rejoicing at this triumph. I AM A CHRISTIAN!!! If you take a life or lives because of the evil you live for then you need to be punished for it. Otherwise, this world can be full of hateful, evil people. STAND FOR WHAT IS GOOD, MORAL, RIGHT, JUST.

Reply
05/03/2011 14:11

I would like to share the greatest response to this I've heard yet:
"Tonight is a night for sober and mature reflection, not glee. Mindless celebration is both spiritually inappropriate and politically naive."

Reply
05/03/2011 17:03

Dear Mark,

Thank you for your thoughts and the discussion that has followed.

Part of the reason I wrote "Paradoxy: Creating Christian Community Beyond Us and Them" was my concern that we in the Christian community have lost the keen appreciation for the paradoxical and the tragic that that was once at the heart of our faith: that what is paradoxical in God's infinite reality becomes tragic in our finite and fallen world: a world in which we experience situation after situation in which there are no truly good choices left, but only the lesser of evils.

In our fallenness, we are tempted to think that we our choices are between good and evil: good people and evil people, good religion and evil religion, good cultures and evil cultures, good war and evil war, good killing and evil killing. But that tempting thought is a lie. We cannot say that "we" are good and "they" are evil; compared to the absolute goodness of God, the most we could possibly say is that we are less evil. We can make the case that to fight a war against Al Qaeda is less evil than the alternative, but we can never claim that it is good. We may make the case that a war is a tragically necessary evil, but that tragic necessity cannot remove the evil. We can make the case that the world is a safer place without OBL, that "taking him out" was a necessary evil, but we cannot pronounce it good, and God does not permit us to celebrate his killing.

We must be under no illusions. Christians cannot do violence outwardly to other human beings without doing violence inwardly to our own consciences. We cannot engage in killing without killing pieces of our own souls. War cannot overcome evil, nor can hate or violence or killing. Only love. As Jesus said, "Do not try to overcome evil with evil. Rather, overcome evil with love."

In Christ's love,
Ken+

Reply
Rhonan
05/03/2011 19:19

Science flies you to the Moon, religion flies you into buildings. 9/11 and Bush's wars have shown many of us that all religion, not just it's more radical forms, is a danger to humanity. Humanity's only chance of survival is for everyone to grow up and stop doing evil because their imaginary friend told them to. Then again, as so many Christians long for the day when their savior returns, and damns everyone who does not believe as they do to hell, I don't hold out much hope for humanity.

Reply
Joel
05/03/2011 20:22

I find that there is a distinction that many are failing to make. There is a difference between the necessity to exert justice and the giddy joy of seeing it carried out. No parent who punishes his child enjoys the act of punishment, yet a responsible and good parent will not hesitate so that the child will learn justice. No Christian should be joyful of Osama's death. Yet even so Christians need not feel guilty or lament that our nation sought a form of justice.

Proverbs 24:17 "Do not rejoice when your enemy falls, and let not your heart be glad when he stumbles."

Ezekiel 18:23 "Have I any pleasure in the death of the Wicked, declares the Lord God, and not rather he should turn from his way and live?"

And yet there is Romans 13 where Paul lays it out that governments are placed by God to carry out justice "Rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad.... For he [rulers/government] is the servant of God, and avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer."

I wonder if perhaps some of the complexity of emotion and thought Christians are struggling with is that human justice carried out by Governments is always incomplete. Osama's death cannot bring back any life lost on 9/11. There is no restoration. This justice, evil turned back on itself, will only come on the final day of judgment and when the Lord comes again. The death of Osama should unite all Christians in calling out "Maranatha!" because not even a necessary calling to account by our government on bin Laden can remotely satisfy the justice needed. Augustine spoke of two cities. The city of Man and the city of God. The conundrum facing modern Christians is we find ourselves as citizens of both cities. Where the City of Man is but only a faint shadow to the City of God and cannot offer any true peace, justice, security and love it is still nevertheless a City that can and does offer a shadow of that peace, justice, security and love. This, I believe, is the tension felt by Christians today in light of bin Laden's death.

Reply
tracy lamothe
05/03/2011 20:25

Thank you for putting into words what my stomach has been feeling for two days now. I feel sad for everyone who thinks that this is somehow going to make the pain and hurt this man caused go away. I noticed a comment that stated he was no just bad but evil. I can't see the difference. Everyone does bad things and If you believe in the Adam and Eve story we all have evil in us. It's up to each of us to make the right choices.

Reply
Joel
05/03/2011 20:28

Rhonan, I cannot help but notice that almost the ONLY people even discussing Osama's death as perhaps not something to rejoice are the religious. (Incidentally you are discussing this yourself on a religious site) I would think that it is much better to have a world filled with people who question joy at any death than to have a world where no one would do so. I agree that religions have been the cause of far too many hurts and pains in this world. I would still argue, however, that remove religion and you would find a much more base society. Indeed anthropologists tell us that civilization began because in large part peoples were united by religion. I fear you may be throwing the baby out with the bathwater by wishing all religion eradicated.

Reply
05/03/2011 22:06

Thank you Mark. I recently put this on facebook "I don't know how to feel about Bin Laden. I can't feel happy that another person has died over the 9-11 tragedy. I didn't like losing all our brothers and sisters. I hated losing the soldiers we have. I don't feel any safer knowing he is dead. The thing I am grateful for is that he has met with God for his ultimate justice for what he did and that won't be an easy sentence". I find it hard celebrating another human beings death. Bin Laden dying doesn't get rid of the evil in this world. When I gave birth to my daughter I flat lined and crossed over. I had done some awful things in my life and I didn't even believe in God. He was willing to take me with all my mistakes and disbelief. I just know Bin Laden didn't go to hell. I am sure he was living in hell while he was here.

Reply
05/04/2011 09:05

"And they'll know we are Christians by our Love"
Well said, it takes a prophet to speak the truth. Jesus said, the world hated me first.

Reply
Toryn
05/04/2011 11:56

Although I am not Christian, I am a very spiritual person, and from the beginning I was sickened by the rejoicing of death. It's absolutely terrible when humans turn into animals, ruled by blood lust. I wish more people could break the mold, and think for themselves, but unfortunately, the united states doesn't really teach people to think for themselves. Let the negative comments flow past you sir, and know that you have support in your feelings.

Reply
NJ
05/04/2011 15:34

While I am not a Christian (raised Catholic, have since become Pantheist) I agree with your perspective. I believe in the connectedness of everything, and anything that diminishes our connectedness is evil. Sometimes it is necessary to go against our better natures, but we need not rejoice in that. I firmly believe this was one of the most difficult decisions President Obama faced in his 2 1/2 years as President. I believe in his Christianity in the truest sense of the word, but I also believe what he authorized was necessary to save hundreds and perhaps thousands of lives. Blessings on our President.

Reply
05/06/2011 21:05

When I read this I knew you would get a lot of negative feedback, however I completely agree with you. Personally, I find it very disturbing to see so many people celebrating a death. I suppose I am naive because I thought we had actually outgrown this sort of thing. Sadly, I was wrong. It is good to know there are others that do not view death as a cause for celebration. I do hope you stand your ground!

Reply
David Wagle
05/23/2011 12:19

I personally agree with your point of view on this one. But a question keeps bugging me and that is this: what would I have done had I sat in Obama's chair? What would one of my Christian heroes, Bonhoeffer, have done?

My issue is not, I believe, so much in the act of assassination, but in the public reaction to the act. I am bothered by our rejoicing in death, but I do not know that his death really bothers me. I certainly want it to bother me. I know that it should bother me. But would it have been responsible for us to do anything other than what we did? Governments must be pragmatic. To that end, pragmatic choices are often between degrees of evil -- either in terms of direct action or as unintended consequences.

Ultimately, could we expect anyone to choose other than the way Obama choose? Wouldn't the knowledge that failure to kill this viper will surely allow someone else to be bit require us to act?

Reply
Karen Otten
07/03/2011 06:33

Reply
karen otten
07/03/2011 07:09

Rejoicing over a killing is what ignorant people do just as they r stirred up to nationalist fervor by failing governmemts but it isn't as bad as the dancing in the stteets on 9/11 by Muslim children in N J. The true dividing line for Christians will always be their response to the Jew and to Israel. They are the enemy as per the Gospel but they are the beloved of God for the Father's sake. At one time this was a more PROTESTANT nation and after the Holocaust we supported Israel. I don't think Jesus would have gone around like a current day pacifist condemning war especially of nation states. He said the .law doesn't pass away yet and he who lives by the sword shall die by the sword . The poor you will always have with you.. he didn't call in a new world order to replace the powers that be. Don't be smug and self-righteous in condemning the U.S. for defending its interests but be about your Father's business of speaking the new Kingdom into the lives of men. You don't change the base emotions of man with holier than thou pacifism.

Reply
anonymous
07/24/2011 11:35

I just read this today and I have to comment. Thank you for having the courage to say what I could not say. I can not find it in my heart to celebrate any death.

Reply
Mariah
08/14/2011 14:05

Thank you so much for having the courage to say what so many of us had trouble voicing. I understand completely WHY they rejoiced in his death, but that doesn't make it right. The Lord mourned Bin Laden's death, I am sure. There is so much to say on this but you already know the words I would say, being the author of this article, and anyone reading here in agreement does, too.

I cannot fathom how anyone could say some of the things I've read here- and you posted that you've deleted the worst of it! My stomach keeps turning at the anger and hateful words. I don't understand how anyone could claim you had a "holier than thou" attitude with this blog- I definitely did not get that from what you wrote at all.

If we are Christians, we follow Christ. There is no place in the Bible that outlines Chris's embrace of violence in any way, for any reason. There is a very clear and easy-to-understand reason for this: He never supported violence. He never supported an eye for an eye. It is true, those who live by the sword die by the sword- but that doesn't mean it is our place, here on Earth, to decide who lives and who dies. Murder is murder is murder, and God will judge accordingly, as it is only He who may do so. Anyone who believes He is as great as God, can take that up with Him.

It still makes my stomach turn to think of all that hate-filled rejoicing. I am not sad that a man filled with so much evil is gone, no, but I am not happy about murder, either.

If that is "holier than thou pacifism," then sobeit. I am comfortable with it.

Thank you very much for voicing what so many have been afraid to voice. I'm only sorry I didn't stumble upon this sooner.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply