Picture
A Personal Response
To The Myth of Redemptive Violence

“Violence is the ethos of our times.
It is the spirituality of the modern world.
It has been accorded the status of a religion,
demanding from its devotees an absolute obedience to death.”
- Walter Wink

Inevitably humans end up at war with each other. It seems to be entrenched in our very beings at times. Over the course of history, peace seems to be a difficult place for humanity to find.  We war over land, over political differences, over ruling parties, over race, over religious beliefs and over natural resources -- just to name few. 

Many early religious traditions would suggest that war and violence are inescapable, necessary and even good. They would have us believe peace, even life itself, entails traveling a path that runs through chaos and violence. It is a perspective which is still pervasive in our world. It says that it is unfortunate but true that war is sometimes needed to achieve peace.  It is a myth – a myth of Redemptive Violence and it has many roots in religion.

"Nonviolence is a power which can be wielded equally by all…”
Mohandas Gandhi, Harijan, September 5, 1936

I stand over and against the myth of redemptive violence. I'm a pacifist. I'm not the lay down and be stomped on like a doormat kind of pacifist, I'm the Jesus-wanna-be kind of pacifist. The kind that looks to the lives of people like Martin Luther King and Gahndi as models for non-violent resistance.  Don't try to re-categorize me either. I'm decidedly a pacifist. Shedding blood should not happen.  Period. Jesus laid down his life, shedding the ultimate blood, to show us what love looked like.  Showing us that love knows no bounds. 

In Christianity the myth of redemptive violence hangs from a tree. It is the ultimate story of redemptive violence is it not? Through pain and blood, sacrifice and death, one man saves the world.  Clearly violence is redemptive, no?

No. We miss a few things when we see it that way. It was love that hung on that tree, not violence.  Jesus did not die for the sake of the War Machine, he died in resistance of the Powers That Be which are protected by the War Machine. Jesus suffered that we might not have to. Jesus suffered to show us how far love was willing to go. Jesus' sacrifice shows us that if love is large enough, no one should ever have to suffer again.

We are to live into that kind of love. We no longer need to make sacrifices of blood. It has been done for us. What that kind of love lived out looks like is seen in the life of Jesus and mirrored in the lives of King and Gandhi.

Seeing the world through the lens of non-viloent resistance, makes a day like today (Veterans Day, formerly Armistice  Day) an eternal conflict for me. I grieve for the dead. Those who died in their country’s service and those who died in the crossfire, sometimes coldly refereed to collateral damage. I cry tears for their families, for their friends for their loved ones. 

But every year my tears fall like so many drops into an ocean of violence that is supported by the myth that violence begets peace, that loving one thing (your country) more than you love the reflection of God carried in the 'enemy's' eyes is somehow redeeming for humanity – growing us closer not only to God, but to the peaceable kingdom which we are to be ushering in. Every year I see an inordinate number of the poor sent to the front line, while the economically powerful fight their war from war rooms and well decorated offices. Every year the tears and the blood fall into the pools of the wars that preceded them.... and nothing changes.

So there is conflict and struggle in my heart, in my soul. The War Machine co-opts a day like today, wraps it in patriotism and manages the difficult task of both relegating the dead to being secondary to it's own promotion of the myth of redemptive violence and (at the same time) suggesting that anyone who has problems with the day are dishonoring those who have served honorably.

So many drops of blood have been spilled. With each drop, I weep. With each drop, God weeps.  Each drop falls into the ocean of violence that came before it. 

Today, I honor those who have died because of war, but I do not honor the War Machine. I reject the  myth of dominance and redemptive violence, and substitute God's reality of love, peace and grace.  With each drop of the blood of Christ, humanity was given a gift.  We have yet to fully embrace that gift. Until we do, love continues to hang on a tree, suffering so that we might not have to. 

 


Comments

11/11/2010 17:03

Great article!

Reply
11/11/2010 17:06

Thanks for giving it a read and for your kind words.

Reply
JanetC
11/11/2010 17:06

Really good, Mark!

Reply
11/11/2010 17:08

As always, Janet. You are too kind.

Reply
Keith Goss
11/11/2010 17:14

From a fellow pacifist: A very encouraging and uplifting article. Well written too. At times I feel lonely being a peacemaker, then all of the sudden I read something such as this and my faith is strengthened. Thanks so much

Keith Goss

Reply
11/11/2010 17:15

Did Jesus suffer so that we might not have to? Or, did Jesus enter into our (inevitable)suffering as the penultimate symbol of solidarity (the ultimate solidarity being the Oneness of God, or Echad (One))? To say that suffering is our doing is our perpetrating violence against each other is accurate, but not entirely. Some suffering is the result of the primordial chaos that overflows ordered banks because, to have it otherwise would be to have nothing, i.e., in order for there to be anything, suffering is always a risk.

Reply
11/11/2010 17:17

Thanks Keith. For my M.Div., my thesis was on Just War and Pacifism, so I'm a little passionate about it.

You are not alone. At all. Thanks for reading the blog and giving feed back.

Reply
11/11/2010 17:20

Michael, I do not disagree with the crux of your point, but I do not think we need to try to limit God to having the cross mean only on thing.

I would point out, however, that the primordial chaos is part of the origins of the myth of redemptive violence.

Love your input though. Very interesting points.

Reply
Keith Goss
11/11/2010 21:51

An example of reducing the cross to mean only one thing would be to only consider it as atonement or salvation from sin, as the Fundamentalists and Evangelicals do. It is that, but it is much more multifaceted and has loving mystery to it that we will never fully understand. Another meaning is that it is an act of reconciliation. "God was in Christ, reconciling the world to himself". This is the facet and concept that sustains me in my peacemaking.

Reply
11/11/2010 21:53

Keith - "loving mystery" - that is on point!

Thanks for the insight!

Reply
gracey
11/11/2010 23:24

You took the words right out of my own heart, this is perfect. Thank you so much.

Reply
11/11/2010 23:27

Gracey, thank you for your time and your thoughts.

Reply
gracey
11/11/2010 23:30

I just want to add, that like Keith mentioned I too feel very very alone in my spiritual walk because there are so few Christian Pacifists. I only have three friends who believe this way and they are on-lines friends. I just don't know the words to describe how wonderful it feels to read something like this and know there is someone else out there who feels the same as I do. I too am very passionate about the fact that Jesus taught non-violence in all situations and running across this article today of all days has blessed me so much. Thanks again!

Reply
11/11/2010 23:38

Gracey, I believe there are more of us than we realize. We have been afraid to won our voice for too long. But we seem to be at a time when we are beginning to re-emerge as a reflection of who God calls us to be.

Good to make the connection with you. Good to see our numbers and voice growing.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply