Love, War, Myth of Redemptive Violence, Superman, Call of Duty, Angry Birds, Sacrificial Love, Hate
Religion and nations alike have bought, hook, line and sinker, into the myth of war. Not that war itself is a myth - clearly it is not. Rather, they bought into the myth that War can make things better. We have this convoluted idea that War is redemptive, that through acts of violence (whether they be preemptive or in retaliation) we can squash out... well, violence. Said differently, we genuinely believe that the path to peace (God's peaceable Kin-dom) is violence.

There is something sadly human about it. Possibly even, sadly masculine about it.  From cartoons to video games, kids (particularly boys) not only buy into, but are instinctively drawn toward this myth, as we take on the role of "good guy" (after all, most of us want to believe that, in such a messed up world, at least we, ourselves, are “good”) and project our own less that laudable personality traits onto the bad guy. "You loser!"  “You're nothing but a violent punk.” From pretending to be Superman in our backyard as kids to playing Call of Duty or even Angry Birds as grown ups, we have a deep inward desire (need?) to take on our perceived role as “good guy” and project our negative, violent, aggressive and even lustful behavior onto the villain (be they Lex Luthor or eggs stealing pigs... those nasty, rotten, mucus-nosed, structure-building, egg-stealing pigs... but I digress).

In a sort of sub-conscious psychological dance, we attempt to vanquish this world of all the evil we see in ourselves and in others through acts of physicality, violence and aggression which we justify by pointing to the higher good they achieve – ridding the world of nastiness and evil.  That's the myth of redemptive violence.  It says that violence can end violence, that war can make peace, that domination can usher in equality. 

The reality of it is that it breeds. Violence breeds violence. War breeds war. Domination breeds domination. Superman never ushers in world peace. He keeps fighting the same battles over and over again.

It turns out, we already understand this reality of violence and war; we already intrinsically get that redemptive violence truly is a myth. Even as we played superheroes as kids, we understood that our actions would never really end the violence in the world. We knew that victory was temporary when it was won through force. We knew that Superman would never usher in world peace. We hoped for it, but we knew different. We cannot beat the demons within (or without) by calling on the very source of their power – namely, excerpting power over others.

As Christians we are called to practice the love of our enemy (even the one within). The concept is essentially “redemptive love.”  Rather than practicing power over, it calls us to participate in power with. In short, Jesus calls us to stick with love. At all cost. Just look at his own life.

As for me, I've decided to go with the advice of Dr. Martin Luther King who once said, “I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear.”

 


Comments

06/03/2011 08:50

An excerpt from Desmond Tutu's new book, God is Not a Christian currently featured on The Huffington Post, talks about this issue of perspective: That whoever and wherever "we" are "we" always think we are in the right.

It has been helpful and enlightening for me to have a wise teacher discuss scripture from a Jungian perspective: the masculine consciousness, the feminine subconsciousness, the transcendent wisdom of Solomon that held in tension the paradox of these influences, and that true growth cannot take place when the psyche is so one-sided to which you allude here in your article.

Reply
06/03/2011 09:29

I was just discussing this with a friend yesterday. Satanists (at least the LaVeyan Satanists) don't actually believe in Satan. They view Satan as an archetype. What they do is glorify behavior the Bible says is morally wrong and against God -- things like greed, jealousy, and revenge. Their view is, "You do me wrong, I'll get you back," and they call that good. Vengeance is good (they believe). Nations act in much the same way. "You attack us, we'll attack you back twice as hard." You begin to see who the world really follows.

Reply
David
07/24/2012 00:23

I always thought of LaVey as a satirist. A lower-rent one than Nietzsche -- but still enjoyable -- satirist.

Reply
Jeff
06/03/2011 10:06

I actually agree very much with this article, but I am very distracted by "roll" when you mean "role", an extra "o" in "looser" (just "loser" gets it done), and even a "to" where it needs to be "too" within the MLK quote.

Reply
06/03/2011 10:36

I need to fire my editor... wait, I'm my editor. This is not going to be an easy conversation. Thanks Jeff. I appreciate you not just commenting on my poor editing in this piece (I'll fix it today - again thanks) but for remarking about the content as well. Honestly, appreciated.

Reply
Roy Askins
06/03/2011 22:32

Interesting article, but what do you do with the Old Testament? God commanded Joshua to exterminate entire nations. He actually punishes Saul because he failed to utterly destroy the Ammonites (I think).

I'm not a war monger or anything, but we need to take seriously that God is not a pacifist. He knows how to wage war, and He does it well.

And thankfully, in fact. Many picture the atonement as a form of warfare, sometimes called Christus Victor. While it's not the only view of the atonement, it does drive the heart of the matter, that someone had to wage war against Satan, a redemptive war in fact. The result of this war is peace, true peace with the Father. That is to say, a war that washes away our sin and brings peace.

I'm not saying it's for each of us to go out and be violent and retributive, but God does give certain institutions the authority to defend life by taking life. We think immediately of Genesis 9:6, or even Romans 13.

Just some thoughts.

Reply
06/04/2011 09:30

Roy, What do you make of Jesus' message of "blessed are the peacemakers" and the imperative to love our enemies and to forgive 7x70?

Reply
09/03/2011 08:22

Thank you very much for this. You know, it's funny, I've been watching the Angry Birds craze with dismay, then feeling like your Great Aunt Amelia for being so prissy. But you articulated why!

Since you were gracious above about a few edits, I hope you won't mind if I mention that I believe you mean "exerting power over others."

Thanks again. :)

Reply
Sarah
09/03/2011 08:45

For those of us who sometimes don't know how to articulate our thoughts on this, you state it very clearly. Thank you.

Reply
JT
09/03/2011 08:57

This is a refreshing and enlightened perspective. What a good thing.
Regarding Roy's comment, it took me a long time to get to the place where I could finally realize that the hand of man penned the Bible. There are beautiful philosophies within its pages. There is also, woven in among those good things, many traces of man's ancient battle with his own bias against his "enemies". The Bible was written during a time that was incredibly tribal. To ignore the fact that had an impact on the author's perspective is turning a blind eye to the facts of the cultures that existed then. As I have grown older and (I hope) a bit wiser, I feel that anything that divides a group of people (especially Christians) is probably the work of human bias that found it's way in to the Good book. It takes much soul searching to examine one's self and determine what is the voice of the Divine and what is not. One must ask the question, “Is what I feel a result of what I have been taught that I should feel (perhaps showing up as prejudice, bias, being judgmental)”? It can be incredible frightening to look that deeply within one’s own lifelong held beliefs and examine what is there and why. However, on the other side exists a better place more attuned to the authentic Christ-like part of a person. It is very easy to spout off a bible verse to validate your judgment of another person’s life. It takes more discipline to ask tough questions of yourself about just how loving and compassionate you really think you are (example: Is what I’m saying coming from a selfish place? Do I need to feel more right than others to be happy?) Human nature leans towards doing the easy thing: judging, needing to feel “right” to keep in place feelings of control and superiority. Divine nature is just the opposite of that: Releasing the need to control, non-judgment, love (these things are much harder to get used to doing). However, like anything worth having, work and discipline bring reward. If the easy thing were from God, then there would be no war or violence because everyone would be doing it. The “easy” road brings nothing but division, creates enemies, and causes a knot in one’s chest. Spirituality and an authentic relationship with God is a discipline (which eventually becomes second nature) that brings a reward worth having: Peace in your heart and authentic love for your fellow human beings.

Reply
El
07/24/2012 18:47

So you believe that your own thoughts and feelings are a better moral guide than the inspired word of God?

Reply
SherrieL
12/14/2012 14:59

I believe what is being conveyed is that the word of God comes through your own inner voice when you learn how to listen to it and not to the base, human prattling that comes from your ego, which is much louder and more prevalent. This also makes it easier to find the truth within scripture, or other writings, and put words that reflect the human author's bias aside.

Sue
09/03/2011 15:24

For all of you who struggle with this topic - I highly recommend that you read Gil Bailie's book Violence Unveiled. He does a lot of work with the violent stories in the Old Testament. Redemptive violence is definitely a myth, and a destructive one.

Reply
06/11/2012 20:38

I'm a military wife, and while I am with you on most of what I've read, I have to argue just a bit here:

Even God ordered wars on people, in the Bible, to make things better.

Reply
Michael Gizzi
07/24/2012 09:48

While in the Old Testament God is pretty violent, as Christians, I'd say we are bound first and foremost by the New Testament, and Jesus most certainly takes a very different position. Love our neighbor as ourselves, and act with compassion, kindness, and patience.

As a society we have become enamored with violence. It pervades television, video games, books, even sports. And it is a lot easier to say "I'm going to take a different path" than to act upon it. Its almost August, and August brings football -- many of us (myself included) love football, but could there be a much more violent sport? The bulk of tv programming in prime time focuses on crime and violence. I intend to refrain from the Dark Knight Rises, but I have been a "fan" of Batman for years. None of this is easy.

If we are to be Jesus followers, then how do we grapple with these issues? It is not easy.

Reply
07/24/2012 07:18

I always assumed the Angry Birds were female...what with the egg-laying. Have I missed something essential?

Reply
Kenn Speicher
04/16/2013 11:46

I agree that redemptive violence is a myth. But is that the same as saying all violence is wrong or misguided? How do you respond to a Hitler? A Stalin? Can we always turn the other cheek?

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply