Mad Men, Palin, Beck, Rush
I don't listen to Rush.  I tried to just so I'd be familiar with what he was saying, but I could actually feel my IQ lowering as I listened... so, I don't listen to Rush.  However, I can all but hear the spin that he and Beck will be putting on the Tuscon Tragedy, “Let's not miss the fact that this man was mentally unstable...for that matter it's starting to sound like he identified with the 'crazies' on the left.”

It won't surprise me if they see this as an opportunity to set up yet another scapegoat for the problems they cause (they already use Muslims, 'Socialists,' and gays just to name a few). If it is something about which the 'average' American might lack in depth knowledge they use the ignorance against them and ramp of the fear (this is where knowledge can be a weapon).  It won't surprise me if they start to villainize those with mental disorders in order to deflect the blame and, as a side effect, have yet another go-to target (yes, I said 'target' intentionally) when they feel like their backs are against the wall...or just when they want to raise the fear level in the nation.

What they need to be doing is steeping up and taking ownership in their roll of creating a nation of Mad Men (not the TV show and in this rare case, for the sake of literary consistency, I'm using 'Man' in place of 'humanity').  These Mad Men (the likes of Beck, Rush and Palin) are intentionally creating more Mad Men and they need to step up and own their part in this national madness which is increasingly bent on violence.

More than that, they need to show a little confidence on their position.  Now I completely get that they are trying to defend some pretty indefensible positions, but that's the point really, isn't it?  If the only way they can make their positions gain footing is by ramping up hate and rage, then it's really not a dependable position at all is it?  If they really believe that what they are saying makes sense, they should drop the divisive language and the subtle language of violence and actually deal with the issues.  If they really believe that what they are saying makes sense, it should be easy to drop the hate-mongering... but I don't think they will.  At least not for very long.

You see, the political machine will ratchet down the hate speech for a brief period, not because they believe it is the right thing to do for humanity, but because they think it is the right thing to do for their re-election campaign. And then the moment they think the eyes of the nation and it's desire to quail the hate-mongering have been subdued by their pursuit of lesser things, they will slowly ramp up the divisive, violence laced rhetoric - not because it's the right thing to do, but because it's the easy thing to do - not because the violence will no longer be incited, but because they believe their own election is more important than any lives that might be lost.  It's mad I tell you... the actions of Mad Men.

We...we are left praying for a 9 year old girl, a Federal court judge, and a congressional aid... all who were killed or injured in the cross fire.  Praying for Congresswoman Giffords and her recovery.  And possibly the hardest part of all, praying for the shooter and for the life that pushed him so far to do something so hateful.  It's not what you are hearing online and on television from commentators, but it is the uncommon thing we Christians are called to do.  For that matter, we need to be praying for the Mad Men too.

 


Comments

01/10/2011 12:47

Amen, amen and amen.

Reply
01/10/2011 12:50

Thank you, your words and the words of others like you are the ones we all should be listening to.


Amen

Reply
01/10/2011 12:57

Kiddush and Joellyn,
I really appreciate you taking the time to read and respond. Thanks!

Reply
01/10/2011 13:04

Great stuff, Mark. I've linked your blog to The Theology Diner.

Reply
01/10/2011 13:09

Thanks Eric. Formating on the main pages is a bit wonky right now, but I'm trying to work that out.
I'm working on improving my blog roll. Once it is up and running, I'll return the favor.

Reply
Randi
01/10/2011 21:16

Perfect, Mark - thanx for your wisdom, which I will be sharing. rkl :)

Reply
01/10/2011 21:19

Randi. Thanks for reading. Thanks for sharing. You rock!

Reply
01/11/2011 00:38

The good thing about praying "for" the mad is that it's like pouring fresh water on a pile of mud and filth: sooner or later it starts to wash it away --- not that you'd want the people to be "washed away"! but the filth to be washed out of their minds and hearts. Or like sunlight on fog: after a while, the sun evaporates it into thin air.

Reply
01/11/2011 07:53

Roger, I always love your angle on things. Well said.

Reply
Don W
01/11/2011 10:15

I am constantly amazed by articles like this, I was referred here by a friend. You begin your opinion piece by stating that you don't listen to Rush and then follow that with a snarky comment about how your IQ was being lowered during the brief time you "tried" to listen. If you don't listen, how in the world do you really know what he is saying. I can tell by the rest of your comments that you "don't listen" to Beck or Palin either. Which means what? You are opining about that which you don't know? Let me get this straight. You are a minister who is casting aspersions against people whose words you have only heard through a media filter. I would encourage you to actually do some personal research, go to original sources, and you may find that this so called "hate-mongering" is mainly spin by political opponents who joyfully take words out of context and present them in such a way so that people like you, who are too smart to listen to these "Mad Men", will form their opinions and consider themselves intellectually superior to the rest of the "idiots" who do listen. Just how does this make you any different than those you slam in this article?

Reply
01/11/2011 12:11

Don, thanks for giving the article a read. While I think you make a general good point, it is made on the assumption that I don't listen to Palin and Beck. I don't listen to Rush (but I've tried), but I do listen to the others. Beck in particular comes off a little "mad." (I'd say in more ways than one, but that's just my opinion - which is what my blog is, a place to express my opinion). Palin a bit as well. I do find they do a good deal of hate-mongering and that's not coming through any media filter.
Again, thanks for taking the time to read and thanks for your comment.
PEACE!

Reply
01/11/2011 21:41

You are all members of the "Ruby Campaign" based on Ruby Bridges, at:
http://fur-licity.blogspot.com/2010/12/ruby-campaign.html :-)

Reply
01/12/2011 08:13

Love it Barbara - thanks for sharing!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply